<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orange County Maglev Trains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lahabra90631.com/city-news/orange-county-maglev-trains.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lahabra90631.com/city-news/orange-county-maglev-trains.html</link>
	<description>La Habra City Guide and Community Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry2372</title>
		<link>http://www.lahabra90631.com/city-news/orange-county-maglev-trains.html/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry2372</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lahabra90631.com/?p=55#comment-58</guid>
		<description>You ask, &quot;...why are so many people pushing for...train technology for a high speed rail corridor that could eventually run from Sacramento to San Diego&quot; and why &quot;...a lower maintenance technology like Maglev is not the first choice for the state&#039;s northern and coastal routes.&quot;  Good points.

The main reasoning I&#039;ve heard is that maglev technology is not as mature and currently is not in widespread commercial service as high-speed rail is around the world.  These are valid points, to be sure, but considering the time that&#039;ll be required to construct the California HSR system, it seems to me that one demonstration corridor -- such as the cities along the Orange Line, say -- might be identified to be built with maglev technology as a way of addressing any technical or economic concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ask, &#8220;&#8230;why are so many people pushing for&#8230;train technology for a high speed rail corridor that could eventually run from Sacramento to San Diego&#8221; and why &#8220;&#8230;a lower maintenance technology like Maglev is not the first choice for the state&#8217;s northern and coastal routes.&#8221;  Good points.</p>
<p>The main reasoning I&#8217;ve heard is that maglev technology is not as mature and currently is not in widespread commercial service as high-speed rail is around the world.  These are valid points, to be sure, but considering the time that&#8217;ll be required to construct the California HSR system, it seems to me that one demonstration corridor &#8212; such as the cities along the Orange Line, say &#8212; might be identified to be built with maglev technology as a way of addressing any technical or economic concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
