<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Orange County Maglev Trains</title> <atom:link href="http://www.lahabra90631.com/city-news/orange-county-maglev-trains.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.lahabra90631.com/city-news/orange-county-maglev-trains.html</link> <description>La Habra City Guide and Community Blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Larry2372</title><link>http://www.lahabra90631.com/city-news/orange-county-maglev-trains.html/comment-page-1#comment-58</link> <dc:creator>Larry2372</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:19:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lahabra90631.com/?p=55#comment-58</guid> <description>You ask, &quot;...why are so many people pushing for...train technology for a high speed rail corridor that could eventually run from Sacramento to San Diego&quot; and why &quot;...a lower maintenance technology like Maglev is not the first choice for the state&#039;s northern and coastal routes.&quot;  Good points.The main reasoning I&#039;ve heard is that maglev technology is not as mature and currently is not in widespread commercial service as high-speed rail is around the world.  These are valid points, to be sure, but considering the time that&#039;ll be required to construct the California HSR system, it seems to me that one demonstration corridor -- such as the cities along the Orange Line, say -- might be identified to be built with maglev technology as a way of addressing any technical or economic concerns.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ask, &#8220;&#8230;why are so many people pushing for&#8230;train technology for a high speed rail corridor that could eventually run from Sacramento to San Diego&#8221; and why &#8220;&#8230;a lower maintenance technology like Maglev is not the first choice for the state&#8217;s northern and coastal routes.&#8221;  Good points.</p><p>The main reasoning I&#8217;ve heard is that maglev technology is not as mature and currently is not in widespread commercial service as high-speed rail is around the world.  These are valid points, to be sure, but considering the time that&#8217;ll be required to construct the California HSR system, it seems to me that one demonstration corridor &#8212; such as the cities along the Orange Line, say &#8212; might be identified to be built with maglev technology as a way of addressing any technical or economic concerns.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: www.lahabra90631.com @ 2012-02-05 21:22:52 -->
